Fig. 1-10 Comparative propulsive efficiencies |
17. The advantages of the propeller/turbine combination have to some extent been offset by the introduction of the by-pass, ducted fan and propfan engines. These engines deal with larger comparative airflows and lower jet velocities than the pure jet engine, thus giving a propulsive efficiency (Part 21) which is comparable to that of the turbo-prop and exceeds that of the pure jet engine (fig. 1-10).
Fig. 1-11 A turbo/ram jet engine. |
the turbo-jet engine (which is used for speeds up to Mach 3) with the ram jet engine, which has good performance at high Mach numbers.
19. The engine is surrounded by a duct that has a
variable intake at the front and an afterburning jet
pipe with a variable nozzle at the rear. During takeoff and acceleration, the engine functions as a conventional turbo-jet with the afterburner lit; at other flight conditions up to Mach 3, the afterburner is inoperative. As the aircraft accelerates through Mach 3, the turbo-jet is shut down and the intake air is diverted from the compressor, by guide vanes, and ducted straight into the afterburning jet pipe, which becomes a ram jet combustion chamber. This engine is suitable for an aircraft requiring high speed and sustained high Mach number cruise conditions where the engine operates in the ram jet mode.
Theoretically, if the intake could completely extend to close (making a seal so air cannot get in), would it be possible to submerge this engine so then to have it run again after taken out of the water?
ReplyDelete